FX-4100 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
35.48
+1999%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-4100 by a whopping 1999% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking891970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.470.24
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data
Current price$1235 (0.9x MSRP)$28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 10513% better value for money than FX-4100.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus support8 × 16 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache128 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 35.48
+1999%
FX-4100 1.69

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-4100 by 1999% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 54878
+2003%
FX-4100 2609

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-4100 by 2003% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 1671
+314%
FX-4100 404

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-4100 by 314% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 13294
+1201%
FX-4100 1022

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-4100 by 1201% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.48 1.69
Recency 25 November 2019 12 October 2011
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 95 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 115 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 833 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or FX-4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.