EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
34.55
+134%
EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
14.77

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms EPYC 7F32 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking108476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.773.61
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.687.77
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date25 November 2019 (5 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399$2,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 392% better value for money than EPYC 7F32.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier3837
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 34.55
+134%
EPYC 7F32 14.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 54888
+134%
EPYC 7F32 23455

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.55 14.77
Recency 25 November 2019 14 April 2020
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a 133.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC 7F32, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F32 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and EPYC 7F32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or EPYC 7F32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.