Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
34.55
+219%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
2021
8 cores / 8 threads, 2060 Watt
10.82

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Apple M1 Pro 8-Core by a whopping 219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking108712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperApple M-Series
Power efficiency11.68no data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)no data
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads488
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache96K (per core)2.3 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache128 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm
Number of transistors19,200 million33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 34.55
+219%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 10.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 54888
+219%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 17191

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.55 10.82
Recency 25 November 2019 18 October 2021
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 2060 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a 219.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and 635.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Pro 8-Core in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 104 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro 8-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.