FX-9590 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
21.04
+216%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms FX-9590 by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2711047
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.80no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency7.672.76
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)6 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed3 GHz4.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache64 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data57 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket TR4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 21.04
+216%
FX-9590 6.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32193
+216%
FX-9590 10194

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 1208
+128%
FX-9590 530

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 7573
+253%
FX-9590 2146

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.04 6.66
Recency 13 August 2018 6 July 2013
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 220 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has a 215.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9590, on the other hand, has 13.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9590 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and FX-9590, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
AMD FX-9590
FX-9590

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 67 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 936 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX or FX-9590, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.