EPYC Embedded 3251 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 391 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.68 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 7.78 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (7 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,799 | $315 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC Embedded 3251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 30 | 25 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC Embedded 3251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket TR4 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC Embedded 3251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC Embedded 3251 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC Embedded 3251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.867 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 8 |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has an age advantage of 5 months, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC Embedded 3251, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and AMD EPYC Embedded 3251. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3251 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
