EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
20.27
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
+84.1%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.7010.66
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.6717.66
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799$2,840

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7513 has 127% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.65 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3026
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm+
Die size213 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket TR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 20.27
EPYC 7513 37.32
+84.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32193
EPYC 7513 59285
+84.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.27 37.32
Recency 13 August 2018 15 March 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 7513 has a 84.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is a desktop processor while EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 67 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.