Xeon E5205 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018, $1,299
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
17.73
+3594%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5205 by a whopping 3594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4283202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency2.990.31
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)no data
Release date2 October 2018 (7 years ago)1 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,299no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon E5205: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)no data
Threads48no data
Base clock speed3 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHzno data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache64 MB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography12 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.212V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon E5205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket TR4LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon E5205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon E5205 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon E5205 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon E5205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 17.73
+3594%
Xeon E5205 0.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 30975
+3596%
Samples: 139
Xeon E5205 838
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.73 0.48
Recency 2 October 2018 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has a 3594% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5205, on the other hand, has 285% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5205 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is a desktop processor while Xeon E5205 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon E5205, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.