EPYC 7282 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018
24 cores / 48 threads
19.36
+0.3%

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking266267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.3515.14
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date2 October 2018 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,299$650
Current price$1150 (0.9x MSRP)$832 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7282 has 62% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSocket TR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 19.36
+0.3%
EPYC 7282 19.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 29949
+0.3%
EPYC 7282 29846

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 1234
EPYC 7282 1244
+0.8%

EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 7309
EPYC 7282 9135
+25%

EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 25% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.36 19.30
Recency 2 October 2018 7 August 2019
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Cost $1299 $650
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is a desktop processor while EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and EPYC 7282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX or EPYC 7282, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.