Xeon E7210 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 511 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.15 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.93 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | ZEN+ (2018−2019) | Tigerton (2007) |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (7 years ago) | 5 September 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $856 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon E7210: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon E7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 4 |
| Socket | Socket TR4 | PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon E7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon E7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon E7210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon E7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.867 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 5 September 2007 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 80 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7210, on the other hand, has 125% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Intel Xeon E7210. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a desktop processor while Xeon E7210 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
