Xeon 6369P vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
18.35
Xeon 6369P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.46
+0.6%

Xeon 6369P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking380377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.6777.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency9.8318.74
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6369P has 905% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2257 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket TR41700
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 18.35
Xeon 6369P 18.46
+0.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 29509
Xeon 6369P 29680
+0.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.35 18.46
Recency 13 August 2018 24 February 2025
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon 6369P, on the other hand, has a 0.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 89.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Intel Xeon 6369P.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a desktop processor while Xeon 6369P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Intel Xeon 6369P
Xeon 6369P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 61 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6369P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon 6369P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.