Xeon 6960P vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.30
Xeon 6960P
2024
72 cores / 144 threads, 500 Watt
74.34
+420%

Xeon 6960P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by a whopping 420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking54217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency3.366.28
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
Release date3 October 2018 (7 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads24144
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB432 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSP3r2FCLGA7529
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory size2 TiB3 TB
Max memory channelsno data12
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 14.30
Xeon 6960P 74.34
+420%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25141
Samples: 325
Xeon 6960P 130659
+420%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.30 74.34
Recency 3 October 2018 24 September 2024
Physical cores 12 72
Threads 24 144
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 500 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6960P, on the other hand, has a 419.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6960P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop processor while Xeon 6960P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Intel Xeon 6960P
Xeon 6960P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 85 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 31 votes

Rate Xeon 6960P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon 6960P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.