Ryzen Embedded 5950E vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 424 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.61 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.40 | no data |
| Architecture codename | ZEN+ (2018−2019) | Vermeer (2020−2024) |
| Release date | 3 October 2018 (6 years ago) | 20 April 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 2x 74 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | 8,300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.867 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 October 2018 | 20 April 2023 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 16 |
| Threads | 24 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 105 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded 5950E has an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen Embedded 5950E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
