EPYC 9654 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads
16.53
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+378%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 378% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money49.4711.98
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2020)Genoa
Release date3 October 2018 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649$11,805
Current price$180 (0.3x MSRP)$3975 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 313% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Technical specs

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)96
Threads24192
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size213 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSP3r2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.53
EPYC 9654 78.96
+378%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 378% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25557
EPYC 9654 122091
+378%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 378% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1262
EPYC 9654 1829
+44.9%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 45% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7186
EPYC 9654 18566
+158%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 158% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.53 78.96
Recency 3 October 2018 10 November 2022
Physical cores 12 96
Threads 24 192
Cost $649 $11805
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 42 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.