A8-7680 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.46
+619%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms A8-7680 by a whopping 619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3671730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.7015.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2020)Godaveri (2014−2018)
Release date3 October 2018 (5 years ago)26 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649no data
Current price$682 (1.1x MSRP)$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-7680 has 35% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size213 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Radeon R7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.46
+619%
A8-7680 2.29

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms A8-7680 by 619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25458
+620%
A8-7680 3537

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms A8-7680 by 620% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.46 2.29
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 45 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 68 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 480 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.