Apple M1 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1998X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
DesignerAMDApple
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release dateno data10 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache32768 KB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)0 Wattno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Ryzen Threadripper 1998X has 100% more physical cores.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1998X is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1998X
Ryzen Threadripper 1998X
Apple M1
M1

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1998X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2414 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.