Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen Threadripper 1998
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 0 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Arc 130V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Ryzen Threadripper 1998 has 100% more physical cores.
Ultra 5 228V, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1998 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 228V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1998 and Core Ultra 5 228V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
