Atom C3508 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1977X

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiencyno data9.46
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release dateno data15 August 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache128 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache32768 KB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 14 4
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 11 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1977X has 250% more physical cores.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has 1309.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1977X is a desktop processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1977X and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1977X
Ryzen Threadripper 1977X
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1977X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1977X or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.