Xeon w9-3595X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1956

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated13
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.42
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data15.47
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data60
Threadsno data120
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32768 KB112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 60
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 385 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1956 has 208% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1956 is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3595X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1956
Ryzen Threadripper 1956
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1956 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 vote

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1956 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.