EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1955
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 783 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 22.62 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.47 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $409 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,875 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 90 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and EPYC 8024P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 90 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1955 has 25% more physical cores.
EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and AMD EPYC 8024P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1955 is a desktop processor while EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
