Turion X2 RM-74 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017, $999
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
15.84
+3671%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Turion X2 RM-74 by a whopping 3671% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5133255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripper2x AMD Turion
Power efficiency3.720.51
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date13 July 2017 (8 years ago)1 January 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Turion X2 RM-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s3600 MHz
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache1.5 MB256 KB
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache32 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Turion X2 RM-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2S1
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Turion X2 RM-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Turion X2 RM-74 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Turion X2 RM-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Turion X2 RM-74.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 15.84
+3671%
Turion X2 RM-74 0.42

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 4754
+173%
Turion X2 RM-74 1740

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 41814
+1137%
Turion X2 RM-74 3380

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.84 0.42
Recency 13 July 2017 1 January 2009
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a 3671.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 RM-74, on the other hand, has 414.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion X2 RM-74 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while Turion X2 RM-74 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 170 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 32 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Turion X2 RM-74, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.