Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017
16 cores / 32 threads
18.01
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018
24 cores / 48 threads
19.55
+8.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking304263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money19.049.82
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date10 August 2017 (6 years old)2 October 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$1,299
Current price$396 (0.4x MSRP)$1150 (0.9x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 94% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

Technical specs

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size213 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,600 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2Socket TR4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s93.867 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 18.01
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 19.55
+8.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 27589
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 29949
+8.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 9% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 1171
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 1234
+5.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 5% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 7538
+3.1%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 7309

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 3% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 4754
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 5241
+10.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 10% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 41814
+11.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 37522

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 11% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.34
+24.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4.16

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 25% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 23
+7.1%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 22

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 7% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 2997
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4376
+46%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 46% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 159
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 173
+8.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 1.73
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 1.9
+9.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 10% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 19
+55.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 12.2

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 56% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 4150
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4261
+2.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 3% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 190
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 202
+6.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 7% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 134
+15.3%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 117

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 15% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 18.01 19.55
Recency 10 August 2017 2 October 2018
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Cost $999 $1299
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 137 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.