Pentium 4 HT 531 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 485 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.75 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.68 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 10 August 2017 (8 years ago) | June 2005 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 HT 531 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 34 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 109 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | 125 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 HT 531 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 84 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 HT 531. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 HT 531 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 HT 531. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 HT 531.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 60 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 84 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium 4 HT 531, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Intel Pentium 4 HT 531. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
