Itanium 9310 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking516not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency3.72no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date13 July 2017 (8 years ago)1 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache32 MB10 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSP3r2FCLGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data50 Bit
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 July 2017 1 January 2010
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

Itanium 9310, on the other hand, has 38% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Intel Itanium 9310. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while Itanium 9310 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 173 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Itanium 9310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Itanium 9310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.