Celeron M 340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Celeron M 340 by a whopping 12085% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 509 | 3642 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.85 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 3.72 | 0.26 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 13 July 2017 (8 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Celeron M 340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 400 MHz |
| Multiplier | 34 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 512 KB L2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.356V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Celeron M 340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | SP3r2 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 24.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Celeron M 340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Celeron M 340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Celeron M 340 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Celeron M 340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Celeron M 340.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 60 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.84 | 0.13 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 24 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a 12084.6% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 340, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 340 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while Celeron M 340 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
