Xeon 6732P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 615 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | 7.36 | no data |
Designer | AMD | Intel |
Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | no data |
Release date | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 April 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon 6732P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 64 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 32 MB | 144 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 3 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 68 °C |
Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon 6732P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | SP3r2 | FCLGA4710 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon 6732P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon 6732P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon 6732P are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon 6732P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon 6732P.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 29 July 2017 | 1 April 2025 |
Physical cores | 16 | 32 |
Threads | 32 | 64 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 94.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6732P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Intel Xeon 6732P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6732P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.