Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 708 | 807 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 2.96 | 7.49 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (8 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 36 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 8 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.61 | 11.54 |
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 177% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
