EPYC 9475F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking534not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency7.27no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,592

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3296
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3r2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 16 48
Threads 32 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 400 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 122.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.