Duron 800 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking527not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Power efficiency7.31no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 May 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads321
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz0.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)64 KB
L3 cache32 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm180 nm
Die size213 mm2105.68 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 14 May 2001
Physical cores 16 1
Threads 32 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 25 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has an age advantage of 16 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 800, on the other hand, has 620% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Duron 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
AMD Duron 800
Duron 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 10 votes

Rate Duron 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or Duron 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.