Celeron N6211 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	477	2092
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.22	3.51
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	Elkhart Lake
Architecture codename	Zen (2017−2020)	Elkhart Lake
Release date	29 July 2017 (6 years ago)	17 July 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$54
Current price	$493	$240 (4.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 163% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	16 (Hexadeca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	32	2
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	3 GHz
L1 cache	96K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	1.5 MB
L3 cache	32 MB	no data
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Die size	213 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	9,600 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	SP3r2	BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR4 Quad-channel

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 outperforms Celeron N6211 by 884% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	14.27	1.45
Recency	29 July 2017	17 July 2022
Physical cores	16	2
Threads	32	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---