EPYC 7773X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.21
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date29 July 2017 (6 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current priceno data$1950

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads28128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size213 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3r2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 22 March 2022
Physical cores 14 64
Threads 28 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 280 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1940 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.