Core i9-12900E vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 339 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 215 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 16 |
| Threads | 28 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core i9-12900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
