Athlon MP 2000+ vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)K7 (2000−2003)
Release date29 July 2017 (6 years ago)27 August 2002 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$319
Current priceno data$63 (0.2x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads281
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus supportno data266 MT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache32 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die size213 mm285 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million37 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt58.2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 27 August 2002
Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 58 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2000+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon MP 2000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940
AMD Athlon MP 2000+
Athlon MP 2000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1940 or Athlon MP 2000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.