i7-2840QM vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017, $799
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
13.13
+502%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-2840QM by a whopping 502% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6412044
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Core i7
Power efficiency3.102.06
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date10 August 2017 (8 years ago)4 September 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier3524
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache32 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2216 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million1160 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2Socket G2
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiB32 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s25.598 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 13.13
+502%
i7-2840QM 2.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23155
+503%
Samples: 762
i7-2840QM 3842
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.13 2.18
Recency 10 August 2017 4 September 2011
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a 502.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

i7-2840QM, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-2840QM in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a desktop processor while Core i7-2840QM is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Intel Core i7-2840QM
Core i7-2840QM

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 441 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i7-2840QM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.