i5-13490F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.54
Core i5-13490F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
17.36
+19.4%

Core i5-13490F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking498366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.6154.87
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency7.6525.29
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date10 August 2017 (7 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13490F has 1090% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2215 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r21700
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 14.54
i5-13490F 17.36
+19.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23093
i5-13490F 27574
+19.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.54 17.36
Recency 10 August 2017 10 February 2023
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 20% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

i5-13490F, on the other hand, has a 19.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 176.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13490F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Core i5-13490F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Intel Core i5-13490F
Core i5-13490F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 383 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 166 votes

Rate Core i5-13490F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or Core i5-13490F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.