Athlon X4 940 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 440 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.07 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 10 August 2017 (6 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
| Current price | $260 (0.3x MSRP) | $44 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 60 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon X4 940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
