A4-3305M vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking478not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.84no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD A-Series
Power efficiency7.64no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date13 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1.125 MB128K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors9600 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2FS1
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 6480G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23089
+2946%
A4-3305M 758

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 1189
+404%
A4-3305M 236

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 7146
+1880%
A4-3305M 361

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 July 2017 14 June 2011
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A4-3305M, on the other hand, has 414.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a desktop processor while A4-3305M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and A4-3305M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
AMD A4-3305M
A4-3305M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 377 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 114 votes

Rate A4-3305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or A4-3305M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.