Intel Core i9-10900F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
14.37
+9.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms Core i9-10900F by 10% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking442513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.0419.39
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date29 July 2017 (6 years old)30 April 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$1052 $457
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10900F has 285% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Technical specs

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2420
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 14.37
+9.9%
i9-10900F 13.07

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms Core i9-10900F by 10% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 22066
+9.9%
i9-10900F 20074

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms Core i9-10900F by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 14.37 13.07
Recency 29 July 2017 30 April 2020
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 24 20
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 21 vote

Rate AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 299 votes

Rate Intel Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920 or Core i9-10900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.