Xeon Phi 7285 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 936 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.56 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Xeon Phi |
| Power efficiency | 3.24 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Knights Mill (2017) |
| Release date | 31 August 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 December 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Phi 7285 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 68 (Octahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 272 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 38 | 15 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 32K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.550-1.2V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Phi 7285 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | SVLCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Phi 7285. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Phi 7285 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Phi 7285 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Phi 7285. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 384 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | 115.212 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Phi 7285.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 60 | 36 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 August 2017 | 1 December 2017 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 68 |
| Threads | 16 | 272 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 100% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7285, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 750% more physical cores and 1600% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Intel Xeon Phi 7285. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7285 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
