EPYC 9654P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
10.59
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
72.13
+581%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X by a whopping 581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.002.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.0218.96
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date30 July 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$10,625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 99% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3824
L1 cache768 KB6 MB
L2 cache4 MB96 MB
L3 cache16 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size213 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors9600 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSP3r2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes60128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.59
EPYC 9654P 72.13
+581%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16820
EPYC 9654P 114570
+581%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.59 72.13
Recency 30 July 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 16 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654P, on the other hand, has a 581.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 126 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.