i3-3240 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
10.59
+620%
Core i3-3240
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.47

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-3240 by a whopping 620% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7402177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.982.62
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency8.022.53
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date31 August 2017 (7 years ago)3 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 52% better value for money than i3-3240.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size213 mm294 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency-1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.59
+620%
i3-3240 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16820
+623%
i3-3240 2328

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 1189
+118%
i3-3240 545

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 5890
+429%
i3-3240 1113

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.59 1.47
Recency 31 August 2017 3 September 2012
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a 620.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

i3-3240, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core i3-3240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 126 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1234 votes

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Core i3-3240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.