Core 2 Solo U2100 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017, $549
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
9.55
+7246%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core 2 Solo U2100 by a whopping 7246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9323605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.56no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperCore 2 Solo
Power efficiency8.18no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Merom-L (2007)
Release date31 August 2017 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$549no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache32 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.8V-1V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 9.55
+7246%
Core 2 Solo U2100 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16841
+7128%
Samples: 355
Core 2 Solo U2100 233
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.55 0.13
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 5 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a 7246.2% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Solo U2100, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo U2100 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while Core 2 Solo U2100 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Intel Core 2 Solo U2100
Core 2 Solo U2100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 140 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Solo U2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core 2 Solo U2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.