Xeon 6505P vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6505P outperforms Ryzen Embedded V3C48 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 745 | 282 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 10.80 | 6.28 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt (2022) | no data |
| Release date | 27 September 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6505P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 82 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6505P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP7 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6505P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6505P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6505P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6505P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6505P.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 88 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.50 | 22.27 |
| Recency | 27 September 2022 | 1 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 150 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 233.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6505P, on the other hand, has a 93.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6505P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6505P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
