Xeon 6325P vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.57
+26.2%
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 outperforms Xeon 6325P by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking694878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency26.9517.47
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameRembrandt (2022)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP71700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 12.57
+26.2%
Xeon 6325P 9.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 20203
+26.2%
Xeon 6325P 16013

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.57 9.96
Recency 27 September 2022 24 February 2025
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has a 26.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6325P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded V3C48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.