Ultra 5 238V vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Renoir (2020−2023) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP | Arc 130V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded V2A46 has 50% more threads.
Ultra 5 238V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 238V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Core Ultra 5 238V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
