Ryzen 5 216 vs Ryzen Embedded V2748

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V2748
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
9.90

Ryzen 5 216 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2748 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1039866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen EmbeddedAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency11.72no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2025)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2026)
Release date10 November 2020 (5 years ago)2 June 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Ryzen 5 216: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.25 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size156 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Ryzen 5 216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Ryzen 5 216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataAES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Ryzen 5 216 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Ryzen 5 216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.269 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphics 448SPAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Ryzen 5 216.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Embedded V2748 9.90
Ryzen 5 216 11.77
+18.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V2748 16945
Samples: 18
Ryzen 5 216 20152
+18.9%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.90 11.77
Recency 10 November 2020 2 June 2026
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

Ryzen Embedded V2748 has 33% more physical cores and 33% more threads.

Ryzen 5 216, on the other hand, has a 19% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 5 216 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Embedded V2748 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 216 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 15 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2748 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 5 216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Ryzen 5 216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.