EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V1807B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.40
EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
25.75
+377%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1807B by a whopping 377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1160190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.37
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen EmbeddedAMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.3110.11
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.35 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier33.535
L1 cache384 KB1 MB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache4 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size209.78 mm274 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B 5.40
EPYC 7F52 25.75
+377%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B 8553
EPYC 7F52 40756
+377%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.40 25.75
Recency 21 February 2018 14 April 2020
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 240 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1807B has 433.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7F52, on the other hand, has a 376.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V1807B in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Embedded V1807B is a desktop processor while EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V1807B and EPYC 7F52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1807B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V1807B or EPYC 7F52, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.