Ultra 7 265 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embeddedno data
Power efficiency26.50no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache128K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size210 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,950 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP51851
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1605B has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V1605B or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.