Celeron 6205 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1658 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 10.89 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.15 | 4.32 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 1 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Ryzen Embedded V1605B has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 4.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Intel Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Embedded V1605B is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
