Xeon Platinum 8174 vs Ryzen Embedded R2314
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1873 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.55 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | no data |
| Release date | 21 June 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon Platinum 8174: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon Platinum 8174 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon Platinum 8174. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon Platinum 8174 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon Platinum 8174 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon Platinum 8174. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon Platinum 8174.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 June 2022 | 1 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 240 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R2314 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 17% more advanced lithography process, and 1500% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8174, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8174. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Embedded R2314 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8174 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
