Xeon E6540 vs Ryzen Embedded R2314
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1807 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 9.04 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | no data |
| Release date | 21 June 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E6540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.27 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 18 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E6540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | FCLGA1567 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E6540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E6540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E6540 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E6540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E6540.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 June 2022 | 1 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R2314 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.
Xeon E6540, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Intel Xeon E6540. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Embedded R2314 is a desktop processor while Xeon E6540 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
